What type of testing is conducted based on observable behavior suggesting impairment?

Reasonable suspicion testing is conducted when an observer notes specific behaviors or signs that suggest an individual may be impaired. This form of testing is rooted in factual observations, such as erratic behavior, slurred speech, or any other indicators that could imply the presence of substances affecting the individual's performance.

This type of testing is critical in situations where the safety of the workplace is paramount, as it allows for prompt action in addressing potential impairment before it leads to accidents or unsafe conditions. The process typically involves training for supervisors to recognize these observable behaviors accurately, ensuring that testing is conducted fairly and in accordance with established protocols.

In contrast, random testing is conducted on a predetermined basis without specific cause, post-accident testing occurs following an incident to determine if substance use contributed, and routine testing is generally scheduled periodically. Each of these options has its own specific context and purpose, but only reasonable suspicion testing directly relies on observable behavior as a foundation for the decision to test.