For collections performed under reasonable suspicion, what is required regarding observation?

When collections are conducted under reasonable suspicion, it is essential that these collections are performed under direct observation. This requirement ensures the integrity of the testing process, as direct observation helps to prevent any potential tampering or manipulation of the specimen. The rationale behind this is to uphold the fairness and accuracy of drug testing, particularly when there is a reasonable basis for believing that the individual has used a prohibited substance.

Direct observation also serves to reassure both the collector and the donor that the process is secure and adheres to established protocols. This level of oversight is particularly critical in situations where there may be concerns about the authenticity of the sample or the behavior of the donor.

In contrast, other options suggest forms of observation or verification that do not align with the stringent standards required for collections done under reasonable suspicion. Indirect observation or reliance on verbal confirmation lacks the necessary rigor and could result in questions regarding the reliability of the sample collected.